Showing posts with label Competition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Competition. Show all posts

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Bloomberg: "Does the Apple iPad Make Strategic Sense?"

It's hard to bet against Apple. The two things I admire most about the company are its ability to think holistically about business models (iPod + iTues, iPhone + the App store, iPad + iBookstore) and its willingness to keep innovating. Imagine how different it would have been if Apple stopped at the first generation iPod, or just rode the iPod for as long as it could. Its willingness to step out and enter into new categories is an important lesson for all companies.

Apple is certainly one of the five most innovative companies today. They make consumer friendly products that do new as well as old tasks (email etc) for consumers. They have been seemingly able to raise the bar continually.

If one is not risking failure, one is not making the movements that lead to innovation. For the most part, it looks like Apple got past most of the challenges they came across in the development of the iPad.

Posted via web from admore's posterous

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Monday, October 27, 2008

ATTACK YOUR OPPONENT WHEN THEY ARE WEAKENED

One firm is taking it to heart that you attack you opponent when they are weak. You try to take their talent and/or drive up their costs during an acquisition.

RJ & Makay is recruiting Merrill Lynch employees to defect before the Bank of America take over is completed. They hope to take top talent or drive up the cost for Bank of America to retain these folks.

See the embedded video nearby. Powerful stuff.






What are your thoughts?

Saturday, May 17, 2008

LA TIMES: Safeway tries downsizing to better fit local needs

The grocer is testing a small-store concept that offers convenience. Wal-Mart has plans to do the same.
By Jerry Hirsch, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
May 17, 2008
Some of the world's retail titans are headed for a battle over smaller grocery stores.

Safeway Stores Inc. jumped into the fray when it quietly opened a 15,000-square-foot store named the Market by Vons in Long Beach on Thursday as part of a test to see whether California shoppers like smaller neighborhood stores.

THOUGHTS
  • Smaller stores can be closer to consumers
  • Smaller stores have more location options [big store locations have large land requirements]
  • Closer community connections [a community store will draw more local shoppers. Instead of a three mile shopper radius it might be less than half a mile. You will see more people you know.]
  • An aging population prefers smaller stores. [Large stores are hard to navigate and the parking situation can be challenging (are there enough handicap parking spaces for peak shopping times at bigger stores?). Small local stores may be close enough to walk to. This will allow seniors who may not drive or no longer have cars to continue living independently.]
  • Smaller stores will have a smaller selection [The average number of SKU's a person/family buys in a year is around 300 (source). A large assortment is not necessary for most categories. Some categories are dominated by a brand and size (Ex: Ketchup). Store assortment should be determined by the consumers that shop there.
OTHER OBSERVATIONS

More bicycle racks would be helpful.
  • Stores can serve more customers with a smaller parking lot if people who live close by ride a bike.
  • This reduces traffic as well as improves air quality.
  • The fitness level of people who bike is improved.
Here in the metropolitan Detroit area Kroger dominates in supermarket sales. When Farmer Jack left the market Kroger acquired the best locations. This increased Kroger market share and keeps competitors with similar store size from expanding here. There are few locations where new 40-60,000 square foot stores can locate. The small store format allows location choice for firms that want to enter the metro Detroit market.

What are your thoughts?

Friday, May 9, 2008

FREAKONOMICS: IS CREDIT DUE?

The Boston Celtics analyze game events in a systematic way. The use some sort of tagging or labeling system. This allows them to analyze what is working and what is not for individual players, situations and floor locations etc.

Should the analyst get credit if Boston wins?

The coaching staff does analysis; they get credit when they analyze, strategize and effectively implement a wining game plan.

My Reply to the Freakonomics post is below

The point may be that when events are labeled or tagged in a system they can be analyzed. Proper analysis leads to learning. Learning leads to knowledge. Applied knowledge leads to desirable results.

The Freakonomics post may spur the imagination of a reader and they will create the next _____ [fill in the blank].

Too many people think there are no opportunities. Thinking, creativity, ideas, analysis and applied efforts will lead to…

Mr. Zarren is attempting to do something that may or may not be successful. But he is DOing something.

People should be encouraged to THINK and be Creative and to give it a shot, win or lose.

What do you think?

David

— Posted by David Damore

Thursday, May 1, 2008

WSJ: Coke, Pepsi Bottlers Try New Sizes To Boost Sales

By BETSY MCKAY
May 2, 2008

Hoping to pump up soda sales, several U.S. soft-drink bottlers are testing alternatives to a convenience-store icon: the 20-ounce bottle.

MY THOUGHTS

  • Lower prices are better price points for consumers
  • Smaller package may have better results on buy 2 promotions
  • A variety of sizes to meet customer demand is a good thing
  • Some consumers do not want 20oz
  • 16.9oz was the glass bottle size back when I was a child

What are your thoughts?

Monday, April 28, 2008

WSJ: Cable Ads Again Accentuate the Negative

It's nice to see the competitive spirit alive and well. Customers should be better off with increasing competition for their business.

Possible results for consumers
  • Lower prices
  • Better service
  • More services offered
  • Better value
  • Customized offers

Read the story in the Wall Street Journal.

Time, DirecTV, Verizon
Raise Rhetoric, Barbs;
Time to 'Blame-Storm'
By VISHESH KUMAR
April 28, 2008; Page B6

The battle for TV customers is getting personal.


A few funny blurbs from the article.

  • "blame-storming"
  • direct, hard-hitting facts
  • "Empty Cable Suit,"
  • rapidly deteriorating landline business

What are your thoughts?

Saturday, April 5, 2008

GOOD VS. PERFECT

"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."


George S. Patton

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

THOUGHTS & QUESTIONS

WIN ON VALUE NOT PRICE




"Perceived value is what really counts."
  • How is your product or service important?
  • How is it different than other firms offerings?
  • Do you truly deliver?
  • How do you communicate your value proposition?




"People buy products and services because of how it makes them feel."
  • Do you believe that?
  • Why do you have that belief?
  • What experiences support or conflict with that?


Your comments, thoughts and ideas are appreciated...